|
Yellowstone County History
|
|
Indian
Depredation Claim #2891
|
On September 13,
1877 the Advance Guard for Chief Joseph’s small band of Nez Perce
Indians destroyed $654.50 of materials and supplies from Joseph MV Cochran’s
home site along the Yellowstone River
(today’s Riverfront Park
area.) To recoup losses, Cochran filed a claim for depredation damages with the
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, for the loss. The claim
process is very lengthy & difficult to prove, as the United States
Government used their Supreme Court Judges as their defense attorneys.
Claimants could file directly with Congress, via the House of Representatives
(or use an attorney), and after all associated branches of Government had their
say (approved to pay ordered), the Speaker of the House would issue a demand to
the Secretary of the Treasury for payment. All of this methodology is extremely
complicated, and designed to eliminate or minimize any such payments, although
all monies were to be paid from the separate and individual Indian Credit
Accounts. (The actually monies in their accounts, the Indian Nations truly
never saw, nor could spend, as the Government did the spending for them in
their name and without any true identification of the funding transfers. It
appears that the actual claims were paid from a general fund, and not from the
individual Indian Nation account.) The Cochran claim was LOST within Congress
and never paid, after 100% verification by them
that the claim was to be paid!
The Nez
Perce raid upon the settlers in the Canyon Creek-Coulson area on September
13, 1877 as time lined from the Congressional Reports associated with DOI Claim
#2891 and personal diaries of others is presented in the applied link. The
pre-battle map sketch of the events is shown below.
To understand how this process actually worked, refer to:
“Indian Depredation Claims, 1796-1920”, by Larry C. Skogen, PhD,
[President of Bismarck State College, and former Professor of History
at the U.S. Air Force Academy]
As originally established by the US Courts, the United
States can only negotiate, trade, hold
treaties, and participate in Wars, and the like between Nations. Thusly, the war-like
actions taken by Chief Joseph to leave his assigned reservation land in 1877,
and depart to Canada
were not actually a war. Accordingly, damages inflicted upon other persons
property and lives by his band, were subject for restitution to the injured
parties by the Nez Perce Nation. When the Nez Perce leaders decided to sell off
the piece of land where Chief Joseph’s band resided, Chief
Joseph retaliated against this tribal decision, refused to join with
his Nation’s companions in the north, and left the reservation, leaving a swath
of relatively minor damages as he gathered supplies along the way. In the
attempt to apprehend Chief Joseph, members of the Nez Perce Nation, other
Indian Tribes and the military were tracking his route, in an attempt to
apprehend him. It was on September 13,
1877 when the Advanced Guard members ransacked Cochran’s homesite in
the local area [Riverfront Park.]
Cochran is just one of several persons filling claims for these
losses. At this time, management of the Depredation Claims was handled through
the DOI/BIA, with the top department managers being directly involved in review
and signoff. The Claims Department was managed by one director and one clerk at
the time, and as tens of thousands of claims started to pour in from various
locations in the US,
they were clearly swamped. This small group couldn’t keep pace with the actions
needed to approve or reject claims, and in 1891 Congress halted all claim
processing until a better system was identified. In 1894 they discovered that
they were already setup to handle claims through the Court of Claims, and no
new system was needed. Congress ordered the Secretary of the Interior to
turnover all files to the Court of Claims for completion of processing. Those
claims already approved for payment were to be processed first, others to
follow in order of their submittal dates. Cochran’s Claim #2891 was fully
approved for payment, and only had to be ‘so stated’ at a House of
Representatives meeting by the Speaker. During the three-year interim, the
fully approved-for-payment files had been issued to him (held within the
Speaker’s Clerk’s office). And there they sat until many years later. The
approval and review cycles follow about as noted below, but during
the processes, two or more originals are created at each step as required, one
goes to the claimant, others forwarded to the appropriate offices as they
become involved. There is a huge amount
of paperwork associated with each processing step, and original copies of all
such actions are provided to the claimant and the case file.
1) Claimant contacts the nearby local Indian Agent (Federal employee) and
receives verbal and written instructions on filing procedures.
2)
Claimant prepares a claim
(handwritten, as there are no typewriters in this area), has it notarized, and
issues it to the Indian Agent. Indian Agent obtains a Claim Number from his
superiors in Washington,
and the DOI/BIA creates a file folder in DOI (Last Name, First Name or
Initials, and Claim Number. [This file
folder stays in DOI, and cannot be relocated nor moved to another branch. The
files within are all originals, and they can move about, since simple-direct
copy machines weren’t yet in use.]
3) The Indian Agent then calls for a first hand review of the claim, and
obtains written testimonies from all persons within the affected claim area.
These are collected by the Agent meeting with each person, and having their
testimony formally recorded.
4) The Agent reviews the claim and the testimonies and then makes a
judgment call as to the probable validity of the claim. Once he determines that
it seems valid, it is forwarded to the DOI with his approval for payment
5) The DOI issues paperwork to the BIA office and they initiate action to
send field agents, who specialize in such claim actions, to verify the claim
and the attesting affidavits.
6) Field Agents first visit the Indian Agent, and then the claimant and
each witness. All documentation is reviewed, and if needed new and/or
additional testimony is obtained. These Agents prepare a written statement, attach
all correspondence related to the claim, and issue back to the BIA Claim Office
with their comments for approval or rejection.
7) The BIA Claim’s Officer files these documents, reviews the case file,
and if all seems to be in order, calls for review with the offender (Chief
Joseph and his members)
8) Special Field Agents are next assigned and go to the offender’s
location and holds a major conference and review. (Interpretors are required). All
statements are written out in English, attested to by the Indian members, and
the documents issued to the Claimant and the DOI/BIA file folder.
9) The BIA Claim’s Officer reviews these documents, and if all were
approved for payment, issues a call for final payment review.
10) The Payment review is a messy affair, with the document file (not the
file folder), and the call for review is issued to various branches of the
government involved with legality (Chief Justices, Secretary of the Treasury,
and others that are involved in the payment cycle. After collecting all
supporting authorities for payment, the HR is called to approve or reject.
After approval of this Bill, it has another review by DOI Secretary, and then
the Speaker calls for issuance of payment for the authorized expenditure to the
Representatives. During this process the claim file folder contents sits in the
Speaker’s office area.
Cochran’s Claim #2891 is about
3-1/2 inches thick, and was fully approved and was sitting for the final step
when the Speaker decided to stop handling all claims in 1891. [So far 14-years
have elapsed.] After the three-year hiatus in searching for a better claim
payment method, the claims were ordered to be delivered by the Secretary of the
Interior directly to the Court of Claims. The Speaker never returned the claim
files he had in his office area to DOI, and the Secretary never bothered to
regain these files he issued to the Speaker, so that they could actually be
sent to the Court. The DOI Secretary only had his staff send the contents in
the folders of each of their files to the Court. As a result numerous files
were omitted from the claim process. Even though numerous searches and
admonishments to the offending officers and staff were noted, only the later
letters in the files were transmitted to the Court. When the Court reviewed the
case file, and upon discovering there was no proof of any claim ever have been
submitted, it was rejected automatically. The Court refused to read the
documentation within the case file, that the contents were delivered to the
Speaker, and not returned. To further compound the problem, when the Court was
assigned to process the Indian Depredation Claims, they created a new file
folder, and assigned numerical sequences to their file folder (Claimant), based
upon the order in which they were received from DOI. Thus Claim #2891 written
on original documentation was crossed out, and became another number (3689)
penciled on the various Cochran claim folders. Approval for Court Claim #2891 (not
Cochran’s) was readily approved by them and paid; leading to the confusion that
Cochran’s documented claim in DOI was stolen and used by another person. It
took over 30-years of investigation to uncover the mix-up of these accounting
numbers.
Within the claim, the various
documents describe the farming/business life in the local area, the actions
taken by the army and Chief Joseph, the various agents, and the people who were
there at the time.
Note: Kate
(Cochran) Dotson, daughter of Joseph MV Cochran, resides in California.
She has been pursuing the failure of Congress to pay this small legitimate
claim for over 40 years, and restore her father’s reputation.
Joseph had four attorneys pursuing this claim when he was alive, and three died
in office during the effort. Apparently the only original set of documents that currently exist, are held by
her. The government apparently will only act upon their copy of the originals,
which they lost.
Cleve Kimmel – (Montana_cal@hughes.net)
Original Release
Date: January1, 2010.
Referenced documents that contain
current copy rights cannot be copied and submitted in their entirety – only
granted excerpts. No file that is downloaded to a recipient can be utilized in
multiple-mailing lists; or for a fee or profit. Files downloaded are for the
expressed usage by the recipient in pursuit of historical information or
genealogical background.